Duh, Very helpful response from editor giving specific reasons that the manuscript would not be sent to referees, Thanks for your joining the Society, by the way, we don't think your historical paper with brand new historical data is right for a history journal. At this point, the editor asked us to review the abstract and the highlights. it.?I? Was nice, encouraging, and motivated his decision to reject. Expected a bit better. 3 months (!) Basically max 3-month turnaround from their side at any stage. Unfair letter from Emi N. Great letters from four referees and three of them are very positive! The third one very general and less useful. The two anonymous referees were surely competent even though they did not go in depth as the editor did. Very good experience. Moderately useful reports. AE rejected without commenting on referee report, At least a quick report with one good comment that can help to improve the paper, but with the other points highlighted by the referee were discussed in the paper. At least they gave decent feedback. Dislike for the computational results for no good reason. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics. Clearly done day before deadline. Department of Economics, 2022-2023 Ph.D. Two years for such outcome. Took 6 weeks. Fast response within one week. EJM - Econ Job Market Demanded a lot of work during r&r but reasons for rejection were already known in the first version. Editor's letter mentioned a 2-1 split in favor of rejection, so she rejected. Pathetic Three reports, one good report the other two average. The editor had good words about the paper but one ref didn't like it, so he rejected it. Very nice experience! paper.? Rejected on the basis of wrong comments. Unfair decision. Editor was very kind. Bit disappointing given the high fee. STAY AWAY from this journal! Desk reject (which is good, if they're going to reject) with no explanation (which is really bad). Bad experience waiting for and ultimately receiving two relatively useless reviews for a comment/note (paper < 10 pages including title/abstract page, references, and tables). Worst experience with a journal so far. I expected better from this journal. I appreciate the quick desk reject. 3 weeks to desk reject. Finance Job Rumors (489,470) General Economics Job Market Discussion (729,758) Micro Job Rumors (15,233) Macro Job Rumors (9,803) European Job Market (101,001) China Job Market (103,523) Industry Rumors (40,348) Comments very helpful, editors took time to read the paper and were engaged throughout the process. Editor desk rejected after a couple of weeks due to lack of fit. Heard nothing and received no replies to my emails. The referee was clearly delaying in order to hold the paper for citation of his own work. 7 days from first submission to minor revision. Avoid this shitty journal. Submission refund. Worst referee report ever. Editor suggests trying different journal. Reports were ok, but total process took way too long. Quick and professional handling by the editor. relatively fast, but referees totally uninformed of the literature. Two rounds of R&R! 1 good report and 1 not so good. Rejected on pretty poor grounds by an associate editor. The referee report was more appropriate for R&R. Long wait to hear back, the referees got changed, and then the editor rejected it based on issues that were known from the beginning. A bit of wait but ok for econ standards. You have to earn it! The referee reports were serious and offered some good suggestions, although one of the referees appeared not to understand the theoretical model used in the paper. Very quick handeling, decent reports. Crawford rejects although refs and editor recommends revision. "Thank you for your paper. Rogerson very quickly pointed out the paper did not merit publication. Some unfair comments about replicating what other papers have done (which are already discussed in the paper!) One referee reports is only 2 short paragraphs long and completely wrong.
econ job market rumors wiki