what idea was espoused with the webster hayne debates

Rachel Venter is a recent graduate of Metropolitan State University of Denver. Speech on the Repeal of the Missouri Compromise. . We see its consequences at this moment, and we shall never cease to see them, perhaps, while the Ohio shall flow. I shrink almost instinctively from a course, however necessary, which may have a tendency to excite sectional feelings, and sectional jealousies. . The debate, which took place between January 19th and January 27th, 1830, encapsulated the major issues facing the newly founded United States in the 1820s and 1830s; the balance of power between the federal and state governments, the development of the democratic process, and the growing tension between Northern and Southern states. What followed, the Webster Hayne debate, was one of the most famous exchanges in Senate history. The people of the United States cherish a devotion to the Union, so pure, so ardent, that nothing short of intolerable oppression, can ever tempt them to do anything that may possibly endanger it. The Webster-Hayne debate laid out key issues faced by the Senate in the 1820s and 1830s. In coming to the consideration of the next great question, what ought to be the future policy of the government in relation to the public lands? . Since as Vice President and President of the Senate, Calhoun could not take place in the debate, Hayne represented the pro-nullification point-of-view. The Webster-Hayne Debate between New Hampshire Senator Daniel Webster and South Carolina Senator Robert Young Hayne highlighted the sectional nature of the controversy. He had allowed himself but a single night from eve to morn to prepare for a critical and crowning occasion. But, according to the gentlemans reading, the object of the Constitution was to consolidate the government, and the means would seem to be, the promotion of injustice, causing domestic discord, and depriving the states and the people of the blessings of liberty forever. Sir, when the gentleman provokes me to such a conflict, I meet him at the threshold. There was no clear winner of the debate, but the Union's victory over the Confederacy just a few decades later brought Webster's ideas to fruition. But I do not understand the doctrine now contended for to be that which, for the sake of distinctness, we may call the right of revolution. The Destiny of America, Speech at the Dedication o An Address. . While the debaters argued about slavery, the economy, protection tariffs, and western land, the real implication was the meaning of the United States Constitution. . Sir, there does not exist, on the face of the whole earth, a population so poor, so wretched, so vile, so loathsome, so utterly destitute of all the comforts, conveniences, and decencies of life, as the unfortunate blacks of Philadelphia, and New York, and Boston. The Confederation was, in strictness, a compact; the states, as states, were parties to it. . . And now, Mr. President, let me run the honorable gentlemans doctrine a little into its practical application. Battle of Fort Sumter in the Civil War | Who Won the Battle of Fort Sumter? . The United States' democratic process was evolving and its leaders were putting the newly ratified Constitution into practice. Visit the dark and narrow lanes, and obscure recesses, which have been assigned by common consent as the abodes of those outcasts of the worldthe free people of color. And here it will be necessary to go back to the origin of the federal government. The Webster-Hayne Debate: Defining Nationhood in the Early American

Restaurants Opening In Santa Barbara, Search Operation Specialist Tiktok Salary, Land For Sale In Poteet, Tx Owner Finance, Did The World Trade Center Have A 13th Floor, Angels Diamond Club Tickets, Articles W