"manuscript under editorial consideration" nature

In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name. Different journals follow different processes to assign the manuscript ID. If the article is from a printed journal, look at the publication information in the front of the journal. Don't forget a lot of papers that are submitted to these high impact journals have tons and tons of figures, so it takes a lot of time to go through all the data. Few days ago, I submitted a manuscript to a journal through their online submission system. What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? [CDATA[> Thank you, -k. -kaveh-. The resubmitted manuscript may be sent back to the original referees or to new referees, at the editors' discretion. [CDATA[> quality, format, scientific novelty, language etc). All the BES journals conduct a standard single-blind review process although Functional Ecology is currently condicting a double-blind experiment.. Each of the BES journals has: A dedicated Editorial Office ; Several Senior or Lead Editors (one of whom also takes the role of Executive Editor or Edior-in-Chief) . Current functional thinking does not Variance of type size within an illustration should be minimal, e.g., do not use 8-pt type on an axis and 20-pt type for the axis label. The manuscript below has entered the review process. This depends a lot on the manuscript management system, and the editorial practices. manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods It contains 1-5 minute videos offering insightful advice, short text posts covering key points, and interactive activities to help consolidate learning. -k. before being sent to te reviewers an editor usually has a quick look at your paper - to see if you meet all the criteria of the journal (e.g. "Under Consideration" vs. "Under Editorial - Dan Ohtan Wang Each new submission is assigned to a primary editor, who reads the paper, consults with the other editors, and then evaluates the novelty and potential impact of the work, the appropriateness for the journal's editorial scope, the conceptual or methodological advances described in the paper, and its potential interest toNature Communications' readership. . [CDATA[// >